那年花开月正圆

一 |     Rivian创始人兼CEO RJ Scaringe在LinkedIn的一篇文章中写道：“当我们审视我们的未来路线图和人工智能/ML的整体作用时，James的到来是最有影响的时候。”Scaringe周三在TechCrunch Disrupt的舞台上重申了这个观点。Scaringe表示，他预计在处理许多驾驶任务的同时仍需要人类驾驶员在必要时接管的2级和3级系统将随着时间的推移变得更好，并且比设计用于处理某些条件下的所有驾驶任务的更重的硬件4级系统扩展得更快。“我认为我们所看到的重硬件系统的情况是，它需要大量的资金且路线图比大多数人预期的要长得多，”Scaringe说道。像Aurora、Argo AI、Cruise、Waymo和Zoox等公司已经花费数十亿美元开发用于乘车和送货的自动驾驶车辆，但还没有大规模商业化。    The Kerala Film Producers’ Association recently released a list of Malayalam films that hit theatres in 2025, complete with their reported commercial performance. What was meant to be an industry update has quickly turned into a flashpoint, drawing sharp criticism from filmmakers, actors and audiences alike.A List That Sparked a StormOne of the earliest voices to question the list was Anuraj Manohar, director of Narivetta, which stars Tovino Thomas. The filmmaker took to social media asking why his film was missing from the document and demanded clarity on the criteria used to compile it. His post opened the floodgates, with netizens and industry insiders scrutinising the accuracy and intent behind the classification of films as superhits, hits or otherwise.The controversy only intensified when actor Nivin Pauly weighed in during a press conference held to promote his upcoming film Sarvam Maya. Addressing reporters, Nivin said that publishing such a list was unnecessary and unprecedented. According to him, cinema is a business like any other and every year will naturally see a mix of profit and loss. He argued that there was no reason to put those figures out in public, especially at a time when the Malayalam industry is trying to evolve and attract fresh investment.                                                                 View this post on Instagram          A post shared by Anuraj Radhamani Manohar (@anurajmanohar)                         Nivin added that making commercial verdicts public in this manner could do more harm than good, as it risks creating a negative perception among potential investors and partners. His statement has since been widely shared, with many agreeing that transparency should not come at the cost of damaging the ecosystem.Confusion Over Hits, Superhits and Missing FilmsAdding to the uproar is the way the association has categorised the year’s releases. Only a small number of films have been labelled as superhits and hits, leaving the majority outside these brackets. This has triggered heated online debates, especially over the classification of certain high-profile titles.A key point of contention is the treatment of Eko and Empuraan. Social media users are questioning why Eko has been listed merely as a hit even though it reportedly earned higher net profits than Empuraan, which the list describes as a superhit. For many, this discrepancy has raised doubts about whether the parameters used were consistent or even reliable.          Equally puzzling is the absence of Sumathi Valavu from either the hit or superhit categories. The film enjoyed a healthy run in theatres and generated strong word of mouth, making its omission all the more glaring. Fans and trade observers have since demanded an explanation from the association, arguing that incomplete or selective reporting only erodes trust.The backlash has also revived a broader conversation about Nivin Pauly’s own recent career trajectory. While several of his films over the past few years have struggled at the box office, many of them have been critically appreciated. In this context, his comments are being read not as defensive but as a plea for a more nuanced understanding of success, one that goes beyond financial labels.As the debate rages on, the Kerala Film Producers’ Association has yet to issue a detailed clarification on how the list was prepared or why certain films were excluded. Until then, the document is likely to remain a sore point, serving as a reminder that in an industry built on collaboration, public scorecards can easily backfire.Also Read: Nivin Pauly, Mohanlal and Pranav Spark a Social Media Frenzy With Surprise Jet Photos。与此同时，“硬件受限”的车辆或传感器较少、自主水平较低的车辆如今已出现在数十万辆消费者和商业车辆上。

二 | “因此，你可以从已部署的车队中获得这种奇妙的学习。因此，虽然硬件较少，但人工智能和ML（机器学习）可以在你的相机训练中发挥的作用，因此，你的规划算法真的相当强大，”Scaringe说道，“所以，作为一家公司，我们的观点是，一个更受硬件限制的系，可以应用于数百万和数百万英里的大量车辆，这是一个将具有更好的长期潜力的平台。”Scaringe表示，随着时间的推移，Rivian将为其车辆增加新的传感方式。

三 | 另外，他还补充称，随着芯片制造商增加计算能力，该汽车制造商可以扩展到4级自主功能。

四 | 改进Rivian的自主功能并不仅仅是为了吸引客户寻找下一个替代特斯拉Autopilot的产品。Scaringe表示，Rivian的保险产品实际上是在鼓励客户使用Driver+，即Rivian的高级驾驶辅助系统品牌。

五 | “原因是它比最好的人类要好得多，”Scaringe说道，“车辆不会查看手机短信，不会因为窗外的东西而分心。因此，进入这些2级、3级系统的安全方面有意推动越来越多的时间由车辆本身来驾驶，是有意义的和真实的。