我的网站

您当前的位置:主页 > 我的网站国内 >

作者:成纯 来源:原创 发布日期:08-21

今日头条

能源化工央企董事长“工资条”公布,这家“一把手”年薪居首_我的网站

命中注定我爱你

一 |     能源央企高管最新年薪情况公布。

二 | 国资委网站近日披露了96家中央企业负责人2023年薪酬信息,其中包括7家能源化工央企,分别为“三桶油”(中国石油集团、中国石化集团、中国海油集团)、“两化”(中国化学工程集团、中国中化集团)、国家管网集团和中煤集团。

三 |     

By Keely Larson | KFF Health News
But even with these two new pools of money intended to last two years, the state’s schools may struggle to remove all but the most dangerous sources of lead, considering about half the schools that tested their water between July 2020 and February 2022 found high lead levels. Medical experts say no amount of lead is safe to ingest.
“When you start replacing faucets and drinking fountains in the hundreds of schools that we have in Montana, that gets eaten up pretty quickly,” said Democratic state Rep. Paul Tuss, who added the state funding to an infrastructure bill passed this spring.
If the total were divided evenly among the approximately 590 schools that need to meet the state’s new lead testing rules, each school would receive less than $8,000 from the state to test and upgrade its faucets, pipes and water fountains. The state already knows that 110 schools have had at least one water fixture with lead levels of 15 parts per billion or higher, three times the level that requires action under Montana rules.
Most schools with lead levels over the state limit could address their “exceedances” with the state money, according to state Department of Environmental Quality spokesperson Moira Davin. “Our plan is to address as many schools as possible with this funding,” she said.
But part of the challenge for Montana is that it doesn’t yet know how extensive a problem its schools have. More than a fifth of the state’s schools facing the new rules — 129 facilities — hadn’t completed any sampling as of Aug. 3, said Greg Montgomery, the director of the department’s Lead in Schools program. And replacing a single school’s pipes can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.
“We are not talking about solving the whole problem here,” said Levin, who worked on lead exposure during her nearly 40 years at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Lead is particularly harmful to children and can lead to brain and nervous system damage and slowed development and growth. It typically gets into drinking water in schools through piping or fixtures. A 2020 state rule requires schools to test water supplies every three years. If lead concentrations surpass 5 parts per billion, fixtures must be addressed — and shut off if higher than 15 ppb.
Jessica Reyes, an economics professor at Amherst College, said prioritizing fountains or pipes with high lead levels after a “first draw” test could help a lot. The test measures lead in water the first time a faucet is turned on for the day, after the water’s been sitting in a pipe all night. That sample provides the best data to pinpoint the greatest risks, she said.
Running all faucets for a few minutes before kids get to school is quite protective for kids, Reyes added, because the quantity of lead diminishes as the water runs. But Reyes likes to imagine a kindergartner who gets to school early for free breakfast and drinks from a water fountain before anyone in the building clears the pipes.
“Everything kids need to grow — lead is the opposite of those,” Reyes said.
Montana officials will decide how to distribute the money from the legislature, reimbursing schools for costs such as installing new faucets, water filters, plumbing and water bottle filling stations. The federal grant, meanwhile, will be used for covering costs related to testing, Montgomery said.
Schools will have to participate in the state’s Lead in Schools program by sampling their drinking water to get any of the state funding, he said, and they won’t be able to use the money on projects completed before the state bill was signed into law.
Montgomery said the amount available to schools would depend on whether they have any fixtures over the “action level,” or fixtures with lead concentrations over 5 ppb. Funding will be prioritized on a first-come, first-served basis, he said.
Even if a school doesn’t have high samples of lead in its test results, Montgomery said, it could seek money to install water bottle filling stations with filters. Schools could also use the money for larger projects such as replacing piping, but, Montgomery said, the state will set a limit on how much each school can get. And, he said, it’s unlikely the money will be able to cover something like a $100,000 pipe replacement project.
The goal is to make money available to all schools, regardless of size, and ensure a couple of schools aren’t “gobbling” the entire amount, Montgomery said. That means schools with extensive issues will likely need to pick which areas to fix.
“We want to make sure the small schools have equal footing as the large schools,” Montgomery said.
Many Montana schools have already launched remediation projects after receiving high lead results.
One sink at Skyview High School in Billings had one of the highest levels of lead detected in schools across the state. Scott Reiter, the executive director of facilities for Billings Public Schools, said the sink was in a control room in the auditorium and people rarely used it. After the results came in, the fixture was removed to make the sink unusable.
On a larger scale, he said, all cold-water piping for drinking and sinks was replaced at Rimrock Learning Center in Billings last summer. Reiter said the school had been remodeled and all fixtures replaced about five years ago, so when lead was detected all over the school, it was clear it wasn’t just one fixture.
“We knew that it had to be in the lines,” Reiter said.
Reiter said the school district used leftover money from a 2013 elementary school district bond to replace Rimrock’s pipes, which he estimated cost $100,000.
While Reiter said he was disappointed costs from the Rimrock pipe replacements and other projects that have already happened couldn’t be reimbursed retroactively, he welcomed the state’s additional funding. “Any help to the schools for something like this is great,” he said.
The Great Falls Public Schools district also exemplifies how extensive and expensive such work can be. The district used $19,511 from an earlier $40,000 state allocation for drinking fountains, water bottle fillers and filters across schools in the district, said Brian Patrick, its director of business services and operations. He said the district also got 783 tests covered by the state, each costing $25.
His district used a bond passed in 2017 to fund a pipe replacement at Lewis and Clark Elementary School, where 23 tests came in at 5 ppb or higher. The pipes were replaced last summer, Patrick said, costing $411,252.
“It doesn’t get fixed in one fell swoop,” Patrick said.
This article was produced by KFF Health News, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF. It has been published with permission.

四 | 央企负责人税前薪酬收入由三大部分组成,包括应付年薪,社会保险、企业年金、补充医疗保险及住房公积金的单位缴存部分,以及其他货币收入(如补贴)。其中,应付薪酬由国资委核定。目前已公布的7家能源化工央企董事长2023年的应付年薪均未超过100万元,整体在65万元至95万元区间波动;其社保、企业年金、补充医疗保险及住房公积金的单位缴存部分金额范围大多在22万元至28万元。整体看,公开披露的能源化工央企董事长税前年薪总额在80万元到121万元范围。

五 | 与2022年情况类似,能源化工央企“一把手”应付薪酬靠前的仍是“三桶油”。中国石油集团董事长戴厚良、中国海油集团董事长汪东进、中国石化集团董事长马永生分别以94.23万元、94.09万元、93.82万元应付薪酬位居前三。中国中煤集团董事长王树东、国家管网集团董事长张伟、中国化学工程集团董事长戴和根、中国中化集团董事长李凡荣则分别以90.35万元、87.14万元、84.43万元、65.07万元应付薪酬次之排列。不过,与2022年相比,2023年包括“三桶油”在内的多数能源化工央企董事长应付薪酬普遍下滑,同比降幅在0.5%-2.1%不等。

六 | 7家能源化工央企中,仅国家管网集团、中国化学工程集团董事长年薪微涨或持平。这一现象或与行业景气度下滑大背景下的企业经营业绩相关。按照《中央企业负责人经营业绩考核办法》,国资委依据年度和任期经营业绩考核结果对企业负责人实施奖惩,经营业绩考核结果作为企业负责人薪酬分配的主要依据和职务任免的重要依据。中国海油在年报中介绍,2023年国际油价在地缘溢价消退及美联储加息背景下波动下跌,英国布伦特(Brent)原油均价同比下降17%至82.2美元/桶。另据中国石油和化学工业联合会数据,中国油气、化工板块2023年营收与净利润双双下滑,原油、天然气及其绝大多数石化产品价格大幅下跌,造成2023年石油石化全行业增产增销不增利。(本文来自第一财经)。

Current article:http://vr3.zongchaeiwengshuabaisisuofu.sbs/828/849ai.html

Published on:22:55:23


Copyright @ 2016-2018 我的网站 版权所有